'/><rect width='800' height='360' fill='url(%23dots)'/><g transform='translate(120 80)'><g stroke='%23ffffff' stroke-opacity='0.2' stroke-width='1'><line x1='0' y1='40' x2='560' y2='40'/><line x1='0' y1='100' x2='560' y2='100'/><line x1='0' y1='160' x2='560' y2='160'/></g><g fill='%23ffffff' fill-opacity='0.35'><rect x='10' y='140' width='30' height='40' rx='3'/><rect x='60' y='120' width='30' height='60' rx='3'/><rect x='110' y='100' width='30' height='80' rx='3'/><rect x='160' y='80' width='30' height='100' rx='3'/><rect x='210' y='60' width='30' height='120' rx='3'/><rect x='260' y='40' width='30' height='140' rx='3'/><rect x='310' y='30' width='30' height='150' rx='3'/><rect x='360' y='20' width='30' height='160' rx='3'/></g><path d='M 25 150 Q 125 110 175 95 T 325 35 L 395 15' fill='none' stroke='%23ffffff' stroke-width='5' stroke-linecap='round'/><circle cx='395' cy='15' r='12' fill='%23ffffff'/><circle cx='395' cy='15' r='6' fill='%23FF801E'/><g transform='translate(460 -10)' fill='%23ffffff' fill-opacity='0.85'><path d='M 0 30 L 30 0 L 60 30 L 45 30 L 45 70 L 15 70 L 15 30 Z'/></g></g></svg>)
Options
- A
A mutual fund unit holder can approach the court of law for a matter which was fairly and transparently stated in the Scheme Documents, but he wasn't aware of it
-
A mutual fund unit holder can approach the court of law for a provision of law, which was fairly and transparently stated in the Scheme Documents, but he wasn't aware of it
Correct answer
- C
Both of the above
- D
None of the above
Why this is the answer
The principle of "caveat emptor" (let the buyer beware) applies in mutual fund investments. Investors are expected to read and understand the Scheme Documents, and they cannot seek legal recourse solely based on lack of awareness of the provisions in those documents.
Test yourself for real
Take a full NISM Series V-A mock test.
Same duration, same weighting, same difficulty distribution as the real exam — with explanations on every question.